EPA 608 Type I Practice Tests

EPA 608 Type I certification practice — small appliances, 5 lbs of refrigerant or less, with the only open-book exam option.

10 tests · 250 questions · Free · No signup · EPA Section 608
Based on the National Electrical Code (NFPA 70) — NEC 2020, 2023 & 2026 editions covered.  ·  Last reviewed Jun 2026

What Is EPA 608 Type I Certification?

EPA Section 608 Type I certification authorizes a technician to work on small appliances: hermetically sealed refrigeration or air conditioning systems that hold 5 pounds or less of refrigerant. That 5-pound charge limit is the single defining rule of Type I. It does not matter how big the appliance looks sitting in someone's kitchen or break room — what matters is how much refrigerant is sealed inside the system. If the charge is 5 lbs or under and the system is hermetically sealed (meaning the compressor and refrigerant circuit are welded or otherwise permanently closed, not accessed through standard service valves the way a split residential system is), it falls under Type I.

A "hermetically sealed" system, for exam purposes, is defined as one where all refrigerant-containing parts are permanently sealed by welding, soldering, brazing, or a similar method that is not intended to be opened for routine service. This is different from a residential split-system air conditioner or heat pump, which is accessed through Schrader valves and service ports and typically falls under Type II even if its charge happens to be under 5 lbs.

Common appliances that qualify as Type I small appliances include:

  • Household refrigerators and freezers
  • Window-unit room air conditioners
  • Package terminal air conditioners (PTACs) — the through-the-wall units common in hotel rooms
  • Dehumidifiers
  • Vending machines with built-in refrigeration
  • Drinking water coolers
  • Some small commercial ice machines

Notice what is not on that list: central split-system air conditioners, residential heat pumps, and most commercial refrigeration racks. Those systems are accessed through service valves rather than being hermetically sealed, and they typically carry more than 5 lbs of charge, so they fall under Type II (or Type III for low-pressure chillers) instead. This is one of the most heavily tested distinctions on the EPA 608 exam, and it trips up a lot of test-takers who assume "small" refers to the physical size of the appliance rather than the charge weight and the sealed construction.

Every EPA 608 certification path requires passing the Core section first (or at the same time as the specialty section, depending on how the test provider structures the exam). Core covers ozone depletion science, the Clean Air Act, recovery/recycling/reclaiming definitions, recordkeeping, and shared safety topics that apply across all appliance types. You cannot hold a valid Type I certification without also passing Core — the two are always paired. If you only need to service small appliances, passing Core + Type I is sufficient; you do not need Type II or Type III unless your work will also touch larger sealed systems, split systems, or low-pressure equipment.

EPA Section 608 certification exists because of the Clean Air Act, which restricts who may purchase and handle regulated refrigerants and who may perform maintenance, service, repair, or disposal work that could release those refrigerants to the atmosphere. Without the appropriate certification type, a technician (or the business employing them) generally cannot legally buy Class I or Class II refrigerants from a wholesale distributor. This is why certification type matters beyond just passing a test: it directly determines what a technician is legally allowed to purchase and service. A technician who holds Type I but not Type II, for instance, can buy refrigerant to service a household refrigerator but is not authorized to purchase refrigerant for or service a residential split-system air conditioner.

It's also worth understanding who is actually required to hold Type I. Anyone who performs maintenance, service, or repair that could reasonably be expected to release refrigerant from a covered small appliance — opening the sealed system, not just plugging in a cord or cleaning a condenser coil from the outside — needs the certification. Simple non-invasive tasks that never touch the sealed refrigerant circuit generally don't trigger the certification requirement, but the moment a technician is cutting into refrigerant lines, brazing, or connecting recovery equipment, certification is required. There is also a long-standing exemption for individuals servicing an appliance they personally own for their own household use, but this exemption does not extend to anyone performing this work for compensation or as part of employment, and the exam expects you to know that distinction rather than assume "small appliance" automatically means "no certification needed."

The Open-Book Option — How It Works

Type I is the only section of the EPA 608 exam that can legally be administered open-book. Core, Type II, Type III, and the combined Universal certification must all be taken closed-book under proctored conditions. This open-book allowance exists because Type I covers a narrower, more mechanically contained scope of work than the other sections, and EPA-approved certifying organizations were given latitude to offer a lower-barrier path specifically for this category.

The trade-off is the passing score. A standard closed-book, proctored EPA 608 exam — whether it's Core, Type I, Type II, Type III, or Universal — requires a 70% passing score. If you choose to take Type I open-book, the passing score jumps to 84% (21 out of 25 questions). The logic is straightforward: if you're allowed to look things up while testing, you're expected to get more of them right, because recall difficulty has been removed from the equation. EPA and the certifying organizations treat the open-book option as a convenience, not a shortcut to an easier pass.

In practice, this means open-book Type I is not automatically the "easy" choice. If your grasp of the material is shaky, spending exam time flipping through pages looking for answers to 25 questions, while needing to get 21 of them right, can actually be harder under time pressure than simply knowing the material cold and clearing a 70% bar closed-book. Open-book tends to make the most sense for people who are reasonably well prepared already and want an extra safety margin, or for technicians taking Type I as a narrow, standalone add-on to other certifications they already hold, where they don't want to over-invest study time in a section they'll rarely draw on.

What counts as allowable reference material for an open-book Type I exam depends on the specific EPA-approved certifying organization administering the test (common providers include ESCO/HVAC Excellence, RSES, and others). Typically, technicians are permitted to bring printed study guides, textbooks, and personal notes, but not another person, phone, or internet-connected device, and not access to another test-taker's materials. Because the allowed materials list is set by the certifying organization and not standardized by EPA itself, always confirm exactly what you may bring with the specific testing provider before exam day — don't assume a rule from one provider carries over to another.

Closed-book Type I, by contrast, is proctored the same way Core, Type II, and Type III are: no reference materials, no notes, no phone. The pass threshold stays at the standard 70%. Many technicians who are pursuing Universal certification (Core + Type I + Type II + Type III) simply take all four sections closed-book in one sitting, since they're already studying the material deeply enough to sit Type II and Type III closed-book anyway, and mixing an open-book Type I into that session adds complexity without much benefit.

There's a practical scheduling consideration too. Open-book exams are sometimes offered in more flexible settings — for example, some employers or trade schools administer open-book Type I in a classroom or training-center setting rather than requiring a trip to a dedicated proctored testing center. If travel time, testing center availability, or scheduling flexibility is a bigger obstacle for you than the material itself, open-book access can be the more practical deciding factor, separate from the difficulty of the 84% bar. Conversely, if you're already sitting for a proctored session to knock out Core, Type II, and Type III, there's little reason not to fold Type I into that same closed-book sitting, since you'll be well past 70%-level readiness on the shared Core material anyway.

One more nuance worth knowing: because the certifying organization sets its own rules for what open-book materials are allowed, the exam format and question bank are otherwise identical whether you sit open-book or closed-book — same number of questions (25 for Type I), same topics, same style of multiple-choice format. The only two things that differ are whether you may consult reference material and what score you need to pass. Don't assume open-book means a different, easier version of the test; it's the same test with a different scoring bar and a different set of ground rules around materials.

When Open-Book Makes Sense

  • You already know the Core material well because you're testing for Universal certification anyway, and Type I is a smaller add-on you're confident about.
  • You want a scheduling or location advantage, such as a classroom-administered exam rather than a trip to a proctored testing center.
  • You're comfortable navigating a reference guide quickly under time pressure and are confident you can locate answers fast enough to still finish within the allotted time.

When Closed-Book Makes More Sense

  • You're testing for Universal certification in one sitting and will already be closed-book for Core, Type II, and Type III.
  • You haven't built confidence flipping through reference material quickly, and worry the lookup process itself will eat into your limited exam time.
  • You'd rather aim for a comfortable margin over 70% than a tight margin over 84%.

Recovery Equipment and Efficiency Rules for Small Appliances

Recovery is the process of removing refrigerant from a system and storing it in an external container without necessarily testing or processing it. For small appliances, EPA sets specific minimum recovery efficiency levels that recovery equipment must achieve, and the required efficiency depends on whether the appliance's compressor is still operating at the time of recovery.

  • 90% recovery efficiency is required when the appliance's compressor is operating and can be used to help push refrigerant out of the system (this is sometimes called "system-dependent" recovery, because the appliance's own compressor is doing part of the work).
  • 80% recovery efficiency is required when the compressor is not operating — for example, if it has failed or burned out — and the technician must use a self-contained recovery unit to pull the refrigerant out without help from the appliance's own compressor.

These 90%/80% figures apply specifically to recovery equipment manufactured after November 15, 1993. Recovery equipment manufactured before that date was allowed to meet a different, lower efficiency standard when used on small appliances; the exam generally does not require you to memorize the exact pre-1993 percentage, only that older equipment was held to a less strict standard and that the 90/80 split applies to equipment built after the November 1993 cutoff. In real-world practice today, virtually all recovery equipment in service was manufactured well after 1993, so the 90%/80% rule is the number you'll actually apply on the job.

It's worth being clear on why small appliances get their own, more lenient recovery-efficiency bar compared to some other equipment categories: small hermetically sealed systems hold relatively little refrigerant to begin with, they're often disposed of rather than repaired once they fail, and requiring the same stringent evacuation levels used on larger comfort-cooling systems would not be practical given how these appliances are typically serviced or scrapped. That said, "more lenient" does not mean "optional" — venting refrigerant from a small appliance instead of recovering it is just as illegal as venting from any other system covered under Section 608.

Two general approaches to recovery come up specifically in the small-appliance context:

  • System-dependent recovery uses the appliance's own compressor to help push refrigerant out of the system and into a recovery container. This only works when the compressor is still functional and able to run, which is why it corresponds to the higher, 90% efficiency requirement — the appliance's own compressor is doing part of the work, so more complete recovery is expected.
  • Self-contained recovery uses a standalone recovery machine with its own compressor to pull refrigerant out of the appliance, independent of whether the appliance's own compressor works. This is the method used when the compressor has failed or is otherwise inoperative, which corresponds to the lower, 80% efficiency requirement, reflecting the practical reality that recovery without help from the appliance's own compressor is inherently less complete.

Recovery equipment used on small appliances is often physically smaller and simpler than the recovery machines used on larger commercial systems, since the charge sizes involved are modest by definition (5 lbs or less). Even so, the recovery machine must still be appropriate for the refrigerant type in the appliance — a recovery unit rated only for non-flammable HFCs like R-134a should never be used on an R-600a (isobutane) system, since flammable refrigerants require recovery equipment, hoses, and storage cylinders specifically rated for flammable service. Using non-rated equipment on a flammable refrigerant is both a safety hazard and, if it results in an inadequate or unsafe recovery, a compliance problem.

After recovery, the technician must also evacuate the system appropriately before any brazing or repair work and before recharging, though the specific vacuum-level and multiple-evacuation requirements that get tested in more depth apply mainly to the Type II and Type III sections, which cover larger and more varied system types. For Type I purposes, the exam's core expectation is that you understand recovery must happen, must meet the 90%/80% efficiency standard appropriate to the compressor's condition, and must use equipment rated for the refrigerant in question.

Recovery is distinct from recycling and reclaiming, and the exam tests this distinction directly:

  • Recovery — removing refrigerant from a system and storing it in an external container, with no requirement that it be cleaned or tested.
  • Recycling — cleaning refrigerant for reuse by removing oil, moisture, acid, and particulates, typically with equipment on-site at the job, without meeting the full purity requirements of reclaimed refrigerant.
  • Reclaiming — processing used refrigerant to the purity standard set by AHRI Standard 700 (essentially new-product purity), which requires chemical analysis and can only be done at a certified reclamation facility, after which the refrigerant can legally be resold as if it were new.
Remember this one number: open-book Type I requires 84% (21/25) to pass — not the standard 70% used on every closed-book EPA 608 exam. A lot of test-takers assume open-book automatically means "easier," walk in underprepared, and run out of time looking up answers to hit a bar that's actually 14 points higher than the closed-book requirement. If you're not confident you can comfortably clear 84% with a reference guide in hand, you may be better off studying to pass closed-book at 70%.
5 lb Small Appliance Threshold Open-Book Option Recovery Efficiency 90%/80% R-600a & Flammable Refrigerants Appliance Disposal Rules
Difficulty:
NEC Edition:
Sort:

Common Refrigerants in Small Appliances

Technicians servicing small appliances will typically encounter a narrower set of refrigerants than those working on larger commercial or comfort-cooling systems, but each one comes with its own handling considerations.

RefrigerantWhere You'll Find ItHandling Notes
R-134aMost household refrigerators and freezers manufactured from the mid-1990s through roughly the 2010s; some window unitsAn HFC, not ozone-depleting, but still subject to the venting ban and recovery requirements under Section 608. Standard recovery equipment handles it without special precautions.
R-600a (isobutane)Many newer household refrigerators and freezers, replacing R-134a in current-production unitsFlammable hydrocarbon refrigerant. Requires spark-free tools, no open flame near the system while charged, adequate ventilation, and recovery equipment/containers rated for flammable refrigerants. Never treat an R-600a system with the same casual handling used on non-flammable HFCs.
R-12Older refrigerators, freezers, and window units manufactured before the CFC phase-out (pre-1996 production generally)A CFC; ozone-depleting and covered by the older, stricter July 1, 1992 venting ban date. Increasingly rare to encounter in working units today but still shows up in older appliances awaiting disposal, and recovery is still legally required before disposal.

The flammability of R-600a deserves emphasis because it's a relatively recent shift in what small-appliance technicians deal with day to day, and it represents a real safety hazard that older training materials may not stress enough. A technician who spent years working exclusively on R-134a refrigerators and treats every appliance the same way risks creating an ignition source around a system charged with a flammable hydrocarbon. Always check the appliance's nameplate or data tag to confirm the refrigerant type before opening a sealed system, and never assume based on the appliance's age or appearance alone.

Practically speaking, the shift toward R-600a matters for the exam in a specific way: whenever a Type I question describes a scenario involving soldering, brazing, electrical work near an open system, or any spark-producing tool, the flammable-refrigerant angle is very likely the point being tested. If the refrigerant identified in the question is isobutane or R-600a, the correct answer will almost always involve extra precaution — ventilation, spark-free tools, no open flame until the system is confirmed empty — rather than the standard handling used for R-134a. Learning to recognize "R-600a" or "isobutane" as a flag word in a question stem is a useful shortcut while studying.

Nameplate charge amounts on small appliances are typically listed in ounces rather than pounds, since most household refrigerators and window units hold well under a pound of refrigerant — often just a few ounces. This is part of why the 5-lb threshold rarely comes into question for genuinely small appliances; it becomes more relevant at the upper edge of the category, such as some larger PTAC units, larger vending machines, or commercial ice machines, where the charge can approach the 5-lb ceiling and a technician needs to actually check the nameplate rather than assume.

A Note on Older, Now-Uncommon Refrigerants

Besides R-12, technicians may occasionally encounter other older refrigerants in legacy small appliances that are still in service or being retired, particularly in older commercial equipment. These are increasingly rare in the field, but the general principle taught for Type I purposes applies regardless of which specific refrigerant is involved: any refrigerant in a small appliance, whether it's a current-production HFC, a flammable hydrocarbon, or a legacy CFC, must be recovered before the appliance is serviced further or disposed of. The venting ban applies uniformly across refrigerant types under Section 608; the enforcement dates (1992 for CFCs/HCFCs, 1995 for HFCs) reflect when each refrigerant class became subject to the ban, not a difference in how seriously the rule is enforced today. As of now, both dates are long past, and the prohibition on venting applies to all of them without exception.

Who Purchases Refrigerant, and What Certification Requires

Only certified technicians (or those working under appropriate supervision arrangements recognized by the certifying framework) may purchase Class I or Class II refrigerants intended for use in appliances covered under Section 608. Refrigerant wholesalers and distributors are required to verify certification before selling regulated refrigerant, which is one of the main enforcement mechanisms behind the entire certification program — it isn't only about who's allowed to physically open a sealed system, it's also about controlling the supply chain for the refrigerant itself. A technician holding Type I certification can purchase small quantities of refrigerant appropriate to small-appliance work but is not authorized to purchase refrigerant for equipment types covered only under Type II or Type III.

This matters for anyone assuming their employer's broader shop certification covers them individually. Certification under Section 608 is issued to the individual technician, not to the business. A shop or contracting company can employ technicians holding a mix of certification types, but each technician is only authorized to do the work and make the purchases that match their own personal certification.

Safe Work Practices for Small Sealed Systems

Soldering and Brazing Safety

Because small appliances are hermetically sealed, gaining access to the compressor or refrigerant circuit for repair almost always involves cutting into copper or aluminum tubing and later soldering or brazing it back together. This creates specific hazards that don't come up on systems accessed through service valves:

  • Refrigerant remaining in the lines can decompose into toxic byproducts, including phosgene gas, when exposed to an open flame during brazing. The system must be fully recovered and evacuated before any flame is applied.
  • Refrigerant oil residue inside the lines can ignite or smoke when heated.
  • Confined work areas (behind a refrigerator, inside a PTAC housing) concentrate fumes and heat, so ventilation matters even for a routine repair.
  • On flammable-refrigerant systems (R-600a units), no brazing or soldering should be performed until the technician has confirmed the system is fully evacuated and purged, given the ignition risk of any residual hydrocarbon vapor.

Appliance Disposal

One of the most commonly tested "real world" scenarios on the Type I exam is appliance disposal. Federal regulation prohibits disposing of a small appliance that still contains refrigerant — the refrigerant must be recovered first, regardless of whether the appliance is being scrapped, recycled for its metal content, or hauled to a landfill or municipal disposal site. This applies just as much to a homeowner's old refrigerator being picked up by a waste hauler or appliance recycler as it does to a technician replacing a failed unit on a service call. In practice, many municipal bulk-trash and appliance-recycling programs require documentation or a sticker showing that refrigerant has already been recovered before they'll accept the unit, precisely because of this requirement.

A technician who disposes of, or knowingly allows disposal of, a small appliance with refrigerant still inside is in violation of the venting prohibition just as surely as if they had deliberately vented the refrigerant through a hose. "I was just getting rid of an old fridge" is not an exception written into the regulation.

This scenario is worth internalizing beyond the exam because it comes up constantly in real service work: a technician replacing a failed household refrigerator, hauling away an old window unit during an install, or decommissioning a bank of vending machines is performing a disposal-adjacent task, and the recovery obligation travels with the appliance regardless of who ultimately scraps it. Many appliance recyclers and scrap dealers now require proof of recovery, such as a completed recovery certification tag attached to the unit, before they will accept it, specifically to protect themselves from being complicit in an illegal venting violation further down the disposal chain.

General Safety Practices

  • Electrical safety — small appliances are plugged into standard household or commercial circuits. Always disconnect power before opening the cabinet or accessing the compressor compartment, not just before brazing.
  • Eye and skin protection — refrigerant escaping under pressure can cause frostbite on contact with skin and serious eye injury. Safety glasses and gloves should be worn any time refrigerant lines are being opened, cut, or connected to recovery equipment.
  • Confined space awareness — refrigerant is heavier than air and can displace oxygen in a poorly ventilated space such as behind a built-in appliance or inside a small mechanical closet housing a PTAC or ice machine. Work in ventilated areas whenever possible.
  • Refrigerant identification before service — never assume the refrigerant type; check the nameplate. Mixing refrigerants, even briefly through cross-contaminated hoses or recovery equipment, creates a contaminated batch that can no longer be reclaimed to standard purity and may also create safety hazards if a flammable and non-flammable refrigerant are combined.
  • Recovery cylinder handling — never overfill a recovery cylinder past its rated capacity, and always use cylinders rated for the specific refrigerant being recovered, including flammable-rated cylinders for R-600a.

Documentation

Technicians should keep records of refrigerant recovered from small appliances, including the type and approximate quantity, consistent with the recordkeeping expectations covered in the Core section. While the specific recordkeeping thresholds and formats are a Core topic rather than a Type I-specific one, Type I exam questions will still expect you to know that recovery from a small appliance must actually happen and be verifiable — not skipped because "it's just a mini-fridge" or "it's such a small charge it doesn't matter."

Common Exam Traps for Type I

TrapWhat Trips People UpThe Fix
The 5 lb thresholdAssuming "small appliance" means physically small, rather than charge weight under 5 lbs in a hermetically sealed systemMemorize: 5 lbs or less and hermetically sealed. Both conditions matter, not just size.
Recovery efficiency percentagesMixing up the 90%/80% small-appliance figures with the different recovery efficiency levels required for Type II or Type III systemsAnchor the 90/80 split specifically to small appliances: 90% with the compressor operating, 80% with it not operating.
Forgetting the Core prerequisiteThinking Type I alone is a complete, standalone certificationCore is required alongside every specialty section, Type I included. There is no valid Type I certification without Core.
Open-book score confusionAssuming the open-book passing score is the same 70% used everywhere else, or assuming open-book is simply "easier"Open-book Type I requires 84% (21/25) — higher than the standard 70%, not lower.
Venting ban datesMixing up the CFC/HCFC date (July 1, 1992) with the HFC date (November 15, 1995)CFCs/HCFCs: 1992. HFCs: 1995. Both fall under the same Section 608 venting prohibition today regardless of the refrigerant's original phase-out date.
Appliance disposalAssuming a small appliance can be scrapped or thrown out without recovering the refrigerant first, since the charge is "so small"Recovery is mandatory before disposal, no exception for small charge size.

Study Tips for Type I

Type I is generally considered the narrowest and least conceptually demanding of the three specialty sections, because it covers one category of equipment (small, sealed, low-charge appliances) rather than the broader range of system types, pressures, and evacuation levels covered under Type II and Type III. That said, "narrower" does not mean "trivial" — the exam still expects precise recall of the 5 lb threshold, the 90%/80% recovery split, and the open-book scoring rule, and these are exactly the kind of specific-number questions that are easy to get wrong under time pressure if you haven't drilled them.

A reasonable study order for someone pursuing Universal certification is to start with Core, since its content (ozone science, the Clean Air Act framework, recovery/recycling/reclaiming definitions) underpins every other section. From there, Type I is a logical next step because its scope is the most contained, which makes it a good confidence-builder before tackling Type II (split systems and larger sealed systems) and Type III (low-pressure chillers), both of which involve more technical detail around evacuation levels, leak standards, and equipment types.

If you only need Type I — for example, you work exclusively on household refrigerators, window units, or vending machines and have no plans to service split-system air conditioners or chillers — you can study Core and Type I together and skip Type II and Type III entirely. There's no requirement to pursue Universal certification if your actual scope of work doesn't call for it.

Practice questions are especially useful for locking in the specific numbers this section is built around: the 5 lb threshold, the 90%/80% recovery efficiency split, the November 15, 1993 equipment manufacture date, the 70% versus 84% passing scores, and the two venting-ban dates. These are the details multiple-choice distractors are designed to exploit, and repetition is the most reliable way to make sure you don't second-guess yourself on exam day.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Type I certification for?

Type I authorizes technicians to purchase refrigerant for and service small appliances — hermetically sealed systems containing 5 lbs or less of refrigerant, such as household refrigerators, window air conditioners, PTACs, dehumidifiers, vending machines, water coolers, and some small ice machines. It must be held alongside Core certification.

Can I take the Type I exam open-book?

Yes. Type I is the only EPA 608 section that can be taken open-book. The trade-off is a higher passing score: 84% (21 out of 25 questions) open-book, versus 70% closed-book. Core, Type II, Type III, and Universal must all be taken closed-book and proctored.

Do I need Type I if I only work on refrigerators?

Yes, if those refrigerators are hermetically sealed systems with 5 lbs or less of charge, which covers essentially all household and small commercial refrigerators. You'd need Type I (plus Core) to legally purchase refrigerant and service those units. You would not need Type II or Type III unless your work also extends to larger or different equipment types.

What's the difference between Type I and Universal certification?

Universal certification means you've passed Core plus all three specialty sections: Type I (small appliances), Type II (high-pressure appliances, including most split-system air conditioners and heat pumps), and Type III (low-pressure appliances, mainly chillers). Type I alone only authorizes you to work on the small-appliance category; Universal authorizes you to work on any EPA 608-covered equipment type.

Is the recovery efficiency requirement for small appliances the same as for other systems?

No. Small appliances have their own recovery efficiency standard: 90% if the compressor is operating at the time of recovery, or 80% if it is not, using recovery equipment manufactured after November 15, 1993. Other equipment categories under Type II and Type III have different, generally stricter, recovery and evacuation requirements.

Can I throw away an old refrigerator without doing anything to the refrigerant first?

No. Refrigerant must be recovered from a small appliance before it is disposed of, scrapped, or recycled, regardless of how small the charge is. This rule applies to technicians, appliance recyclers, and disposal programs alike — there is no minimum-charge exception.

What refrigerants will I actually encounter working on small appliances?

Most commonly R-134a in refrigerators and freezers from roughly the mid-1990s through the 2010s, and R-600a (isobutane) in many newer refrigerators. R-600a is flammable and requires spark-free tools and proper ventilation. Older units may still contain R-12, an ozone-depleting CFC that is increasingly rare in working equipment but still turns up in appliances being retired.

Does passing Type I closed-book count the same as passing it open-book?

Yes. Once you pass Type I — whether open-book at 84% or closed-book at 70% — the resulting certification is identical. The certificate does not indicate which method you used to pass; it simply shows that you hold Type I certification.